Toni M Massaro
- Professor, Law
- Regents Professor
- Endowed Chair, Milton O Riepe-Constitutional Law
- J.D. Law
- College of William and Mary, Marshall-Wythe School of Law
- Northwestern University
- Regents Professor and Milton O. Riepe Chair in Constitutional Law, Dean Emerita, University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law (1989 - Ongoing)
- Visiting Professor of Law, UNC Chapel Hill School of Law (1989)
- Visiting Professor of Law, Stanford University (1989)
- Visiting Professor of Law, University of Frankfurt (1987)
- Professor of Law, University of Florida School of Law (1984 - 1989)
- Associate Professor of Law, Washington and Lee University (1982 - 1984)
- Associate, Vedder,Price, Kaufman and Kammholz (1980 - 1982)
Licensure & Certification
- Supreme Court Bar (2006)
- Member, American Law Institute (2008)
- Member of the Bar, Supreme Court Bar (1989)
- Member (inactive), Illinois State Bar (1980)
No activities entered.
Constitutional Law ILAW 606 (Spring 2019)
Equal ProtectionLAW 615D (Spring 2019)
Independent StudyLAW 699 (Spring 2019)
Freedom of Speech and ReligionLAW 615E (Fall 2018)
Independent StudyLAW 699 (Fall 2018)
Substantial Paper SmnrLAW 696N (Fall 2018)
Constitutional Law ILAW 606 (Spring 2018)
Equal ProtectionLAW 615D (Spring 2018)
Independent StudyLAW 699 (Spring 2018)
Presidential PowerLAW 615A (Spring 2018)
Freedom of Speech and ReligionLAW 615E (Fall 2017)
Independent StudyLAW 699 (Fall 2017)
Honors ThesisPHIL 498H (Summer I 2017)
Constitutional Law ILAW 606 (Spring 2017)
Honors ThesisPHIL 498H (Spring 2017)
Substantial Paper SmnrLAW 696N (Spring 2017)
- Massaro, T. M., Spaulding, N. W., & Babcock, B. A. (2015). Civil Procedure: Cases and Materials (2015 update). Aspen.
- Massaro, T. M. (2017). Chilling Rights. Colorado Law Review, 88(1), 64.
- Massaro, T. M., & Brooks, E. E. (2017). Flint of Outrage. Notre Dame Law Review, 93, 58.More infoAnalysis of constitutional issue regarding water contamination in Flint, MI.
- Massaro, T. M., Norton, H., & Kaminskie, M. E. (2017). Siri-ously 2.0: What Artificial Intelligence Reveals About the First Amendment. Minnesota Law Review, 101(6), 47.More infoThis is an in-depth follow-up to Siri-ously.1, incorporating feedback and critiques from presentations, especially from We, Robot! Conference.Analysis of free speech theories and their surprising inability to rule out free speech rights for A.I.
- Massaro, T. M. (2016). The Lawfulness of the Same-Sex Marriage Decisions: Charles Black on Obergefell. William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 25(321), 22.
- Massaro, T. M., & Norton, H. L. (2016). Siri-ously: Free Speech Rights of Artificial Intelligence. Northwestern Law Review, 110(5), 27.
- Bambauer, J. R., & Massaro, T. M. (2015). Outrageous and Irrational. 100 MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW 1(281).
- Massaro, T. M. (2015). Nuts and Seeds. Denver Law Review, 92(2), 325-362.
- Massaro, T. M., & Bambauer, J. (2015). Outrageous and Irrational. Minnesota Law Review, 100, 281-354.
- Massaro, T. M. (2011). Foreign nationals, electoral spending, and the first amendment. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 34(2), 663-703.
- Massaro, T. M. (1998). Reviving Hugo Black? The court's "jot for jot" account of substantive due process. New York University Law Review, 73(4), 1086-1121.More infoAbstract: In Graham v. Connor, the United States Supreme Court held that the Fourth Amendment effectively preempts any substantive due process claims that law enforcement officers used excessive force in the course of an arrest. Graham's disarmingly simple rationale was that an explicit textual provision trumps a more general constitutional provision. Professor Massaro argues that this rationale, as subsequently invoked by the Supreme Court and expansively applied by the lower courts in First, Fourth, Fifth, and Eighth Amendment cases, may ultimately have a pervasive impact on substantive due process. At the very least, the logic of Graham requires that substantive due process be confined to its current doctrinal limits. Carried to its furthest extreme, Graham requires overruling the Court's substantive due process "unenumerated rights" caselaw altogether. The author argues that Graham is an analytical and doctrinal oddity, inconsistent with well-accepted and regularly enforced principles of constitutional interpretation, that should be overruled rather than used to revive Hugo Black's "jot for jot" account of substantive due process.
- Massaro, T. M. (1997). The meanings of shame: Implications for Legal Reform. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 3(4), 645-704.More infoAbstract: This article describes and critiques the recent revival of interest in shame and shaming in various contexts, including criminal punishment. In particular, it addresses criminal sanctions that require defendants to wear signs in public, or to otherwise advertise their convictions. The article begins with the work of culture critics who claim that Americans have become shameless in ways that undermine important social and legal goals. The author takes issue with these critics and warns against legal reforms based on their provocative but potentially destructive call to shame. The author argues that the culture critics tend to conflate three terms: shame, shaming, and shameful and explains why separation of these terms is crucial to meaningful discussions about whether Americans have "lost" their sense of shame or should be shamed for violating social or legal norms. The author then develops the psychological and the anthropological meanings of shame, uses this backdrop to evaluate all three terms, and speculates about the likely individual and social consequences of official shaming techniques. The insight of these materials is that shame is a sophisticated, context-sensitive, and potentially highly destructive emotion. Only in certain cultural settings is official shaming likely to prove an effective or humane method of enforcing norm observation. Finally, the author applies these insights to the use of shaming penalties by courts in criminal cases and concludes that American criminal courts may be ill-equipped to exploit offender or audience shame vulnerabilities in a way that makes practical or moral sense.
- Massaro, T. M. (1996). Gay Rights, Thick and Thin. Stanford Law Review, 49(1), 45-.More infoAbstract: In this article, Professor Massaro observes that constitutional bases for gay rights have rested primarily on "thick" doctrine - First Amendment, privacy, and equal protection caselaw - in an effort to secure strict scrutiny of antigay measures. Although attractive in some respects, these arguments pose significant risks of double-binds and boomerangs in the long run, even if they yield short-term legal victories. Moreover, "thick" arguments are sufficiently porous to support judges' chilly responses to gay rights - responses that cannot be explained by inexorable doctrinal logic, but instead arise from hostility toward homosexuality in particular, and ignorance about sexuality in general. Thus, Professor Massaro argues for invoking "thin" doctrine - rational basis analysis - to expose these underlying factors. "Thin" doctrine directs judicial attention away from distracting doctrinal complexities and toward the central issue: "What is wrong with homosexuality?" Thin doctrine answers this question by posing fewer risks of double-binds, avoiding attempts to define homosexuality, and requiring minimal revision of the existing doctrinal structure. Finally, responses to this question are framed by consulting emerging interdisciplinary work that grapples with the unreason of Bowers v. Hardwick. The recent decision of Evans v. Romer is an important illustration of how thin doctrine can succeed where more ornate legal theories fail.
- Massaro, T. M. (1986). Continuing competency--regulatory alternatives.. Issues (National Council of State Boards of Nursing (U.S.)), 7(4), 8-10.More infoPMID: 3641794;
- Reed, M. E., & Massaro, T. M. (1982). The surgeon's liability as a Good Samaritan.. Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons, 67(7), 22-23, 30.More infoPMID: 10255858;
- Reed, M. E., & Massaro, T. M. (1981). Legal aspects of patient confidentiality.. Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons, 66(7), 17-18.More infoPMID: 10251705;
- Reed, M. E., & Massaro, T. M. (1981). When to refer a patient to a specialist.. Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons, 66(5), 37-38.More infoPMID: 10250886;
- Massaro, T. M. (2018. Interview on Artificial Intelligence and Free Speech. NPR.
- Massaro, T. M. (2018. Interview on Travel Ban and DACA. Law 360.
- Massaro, T. M. (2017. Interview regarding free speech in aftermath of Charlottesville protest. NY Public Radio.
- Massaro, T. M. (2016. NPR Marketplace (Tech) Radio interview.More infoNPR Marketplace (Tech) radio interview, broadcast nationally on free speech rights of A.I.
- Massaro, T. M. (2016. Wall Street Journal interview & story on free speech rights of A.I., online.More infoWall Street Journal - Interview and story on free speech rights of A.I., online
- Massaro, T. M. (2015. Arizona Daily Star, Arizona Republic and Arizona Wildcat interviews.More infoMultiple interviews with Arizona Daily Star, Arizona Republic and Arizona Wildcat reporters on various constitutional issues over the past two years.
- Massaro, T. M. (2015. New Republic interview.More infoInterview with New Republic writer on revival of shaming penalties
- Massaro, T. M., Resnik, J., Vladeck, S. I., Feder, M., Levine, S. L., Rice, A. K., Lindberg, C. N., Temkin, E. M., & Kaufman, A. L. (2018, March). Amicus Brief in United States v. Sanchez-Gomez. United States Supreme Court.
- Massaro, T. M. (2017, February). Amazon Argues Alexa Speech Protected By First Amendment In Murder Trial Fight. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2017/02/23/amazon-echo-alexa-murder-trial-first-amendment-rights/#37dc69ef5d81More infoQuoted in Forbes magazine article making reference to published paper "Siri-ously? Free Speech Rights and Artificial Intelligence," (Massaro, Toni M. and Norton, Helen L., Siri-ously? Free Speech Rights and Artificial Intelligence (October 4, 2016). 110 Northwestern University Law Review 1169 (2016)).
- Massaro, T. M. (2017, June). Free Speech Rights of Anti-Muslim Protesters. NYC NPR.
- Massaro, T. M. (2017, spring). Q&A on Immigration Policies in the City of Tucson for Vice Mayor Romero.
- Massaro, T. M. (2017, spring). Testimony. The AZ State Legislative Federalism Committee on Constitutional Conventions.
- Massaro, T. M., Kaminski, M. E., & Norton, H. (2017, March). Does Alexa Have Free Speech Rights? On the First Amendment and artificial intelligence.. Slate. http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2017/03/does_amazon_s_alexa_have_free_speech_rights.html
- Massaro, T. M. (2016, February). Amicus Brief of First Amendment Legal Scholars, Wikimedia FDN v. NSA.
- Massaro, T. M. (2016, November). At Federalist Society, Scholar Casts Scalia's Sharp Rhetoric in Negative Light, Q&A with Tony Mauro. The National Law Journal - Supreme Court Brief. Mauro, T. (2016, November 22). At Federalist Society, Scholar Casts Scalia's Sharp Rhetoric in Negative Light. Retrieved July 06, 2017, from http://www.nationallawjournal.com/supremecourtbrief/id=1202773027992More infoInterviewed by Tony Mauro for the Supreme Court Brief, the National Law Journal.