Jump to navigation

The University of Arizona Wordmark Line Logo White
UA Profiles | Home
  • Phonebook
  • Edit My Profile
  • Feedback

Profiles search form

Patricia L Anders

Contact
  • planders@arizona.edu
  • Bio
  • Interests
  • Courses
  • Scholarly Contributions

Bio

No activities entered.

Related Links

Share Profile

Interests

No activities entered.

Courses

2020-21 Courses

  • Dissertation
    TLS 920 (Spring 2021)

2019-20 Courses

  • Dissertation
    TLS 920 (Spring 2020)
  • Dissertation
    TLS 920 (Fall 2019)

2018-19 Courses

  • Dissertation
    TLS 920 (Spring 2019)
  • Dissertation
    TLS 920 (Fall 2018)

2017-18 Courses

  • Dissertation
    LRC 920 (Spring 2018)
  • Dissertation
    LRC 920 (Fall 2017)
  • Internship
    LRC 693 (Fall 2017)

2016-17 Courses

  • Dissertation
    LRC 920 (Summer I 2017)
  • Master's Report
    LRC 909 (Summer I 2017)
  • Research
    LRC 900 (Summer I 2017)
  • Curricular Leadersh-Lit & Lang
    LRC 526 (Spring 2017)
  • Dissertation
    LRC 920 (Spring 2017)
  • Independent Study
    LRC 599 (Spring 2017)
  • Independent Study
    LRC 699 (Spring 2017)
  • Internship
    LRC 693 (Spring 2017)
  • Lit Content Areas for Children
    LRC 522 (Spring 2017)
  • Master's Report
    LRC 909 (Spring 2017)
  • Dissertation
    LRC 920 (Fall 2016)
  • Family & Community Literacies
    TLS 305 (Fall 2016)
  • Master's Report
    LRC 909 (Fall 2016)
  • Research
    LRC 900 (Fall 2016)

2015-16 Courses

  • Curricular Leadersh-Lit & Lang
    LRC 526 (Spring 2016)
  • Dissertation
    LRC 920 (Spring 2016)
  • Independent Study
    LRC 699 (Spring 2016)
  • Literacy Content Areas-Adolesc
    LRC 523 (Spring 2016)
  • Master's Report
    LRC 909 (Spring 2016)
  • Preceptorship
    LRC 591 (Spring 2016)

Related Links

UA Course Catalog

Scholarly Contributions

Chapters

  • Anders, P. L. (2014). Literacy letters and developmental readers' reading.. In Teaching developmental reading: Historical, theoretical, and practical knowledge. Boston, MA: Bedford/St Martins.

Journals/Publications

  • Wilson, A. A., Chavez, K., & Anders, P. L. (2012). From the koran and family guy: Expressions of identity in english learners digital podcasts. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 55(5), 374-384.
  • Risko, V. J., Roller, C. M., Cummins, C., Bean, R. M., Block, C. C., Anders, P. L., & Flood, J. (2008). A critical analysis of research on reading teacher education. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(3), 252-288.
    More info
    Abstract: The authors provide a review and critique of 82 empirical investigations conducted in the United States on teacher preparation for reading instruction. These studies were chosen from a pool of 298 based on the authors′ coding of research quality indicators. Applying an inductive paradigmatic analysis of the 82 studies, this review suggests that in recent years reading teacher preparation programs have been relatively successful in changing prospective teachers′ knowledge and beliefs, and a smaller number of studies documents that under certain conditions pedagogical knowledge influenced actual teaching practice. As in earlier reviews, there were very few studies that included pupil achievement as a measure. In addition, the review suggests that university teaching practices that benefit applications of pedagogical knowledge provide explicit explanations and examples, demonstrations of practices, and opportunities for guided practice of teaching strategies in practicum settings with pupils. This analysis builds on more general teacher education research reviews by identifying contributions and limitations of reading teacher education research and providing recommendations for future research. © 2008 International Reading Association.
  • Anders, P. L. (1998). The literacy council: People are the key to an effective program. NASSP Bulletin, 82(600), 16-23.
  • Evans, K. S., Alvermann, D., & Anders, P. L. (1998). Literature discussion groups: An examination of gender roles. Reading Research and Instruction, 37(2), 107-122.
    More info
    Abstract: In this article we highlight the experiences of three females who were members of peer-led literature discussion groups to more closely examine the notions of empowerment, student voice, and student silence. The experiences of these three girls revealed that gendered talk exists in literature discussions that often reinforces sexist stereotypes, and that a group's notion of power may influence whose voices are allowed to be heard and whose voices are silenced. The discussion groups of which the girls were a part appeared to enact different conceptions of power. One group utilized a "power as property" notion of power where power was viewed as a commodity that existed in a limited amount and could be given or taken away. Using such a conception of power, the boys in this group attempted to "take power away" from the girls in their group by silencing them. The second group displayed an understanding of power that allowed different members to exercise their personal power in whatever ways they felt comfortable. Furthermore, several members exercised their power in an effort to help a quiet member of their group exercise power. The girls' experiences suggest there may be different reasons for why students are silent and provide alternative ways to interpret students' silence. Implications for instruction and research are discussed.
  • Richardson, V., & Anders, P. L. (1998). A view from across the Grand Canyon. Learning Disability Quarterly, 21(1), 85-97.
  • Bos, C. S., Anders, P. L., Filip, D., & Jaffe, L. E. (1989). The effects of an interactive instructional strategy for enhancing reading comprehension and content area learning for students with learning disabilities.. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22(6), 384-390.
    More info
    PMID: 2738473;Abstract: This study investigated the effectiveness of an interactive vocabulary instructional strategy, semantic-feature analysis (SFA), on the content area text comprehension of adolescents with learning disabilities. Prior to reading a social studies text, students in resource classes either completed a relationship chart as part of the SFA condition or used the dictionary to write definitions and sentences as part of the contrast condition. Passage comprehension was measured on a multiple-choice test consisting of two types of items, vocabulary and conceptual. Comprehension was measured immediately following teaching and again 6 months after teaching. Prior knowledge for the content of the passage served as a covariate. Results indicated that students in the SFA instructional condition had significantly greater measured comprehension immediately following and 6 months after initial teaching. These results are discussed in relation to concept-driven, interactive strategies for teaching content and facilitating text comprehension.

 Edit my profile

UA Profiles | Home

University Information Security and Privacy

© 2026 The Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of The University of Arizona.