Saher Khalid
- Assistant Clinical Professor, Medicine - (Clinical Series Track)
Contact
- (520) 626-6453
- AHSC, Rm. 2301
- saherkhalid@arizona.edu
Biography
My name is Saher Khalid, and I am practicing Internal Medicine at University of Arizona–Banner health. I am originally from Pakistan, and I completed my MBBS over there. I got my residency training at Cleveland Clinic–Akron General, and moved to Arizona with my family 2 years ago.My choice to specialize in Internal Medicine stems from the desire to engage with a diverse patient population and nurture long-term relationships with them in my outpatient clinic. By addressing their chronic health issues and fostering strong connections with my patients, I have the privilege of making a meaningful impact on their day-to-day lives.I hold a strong belief in the importance of preventative health management and remain committed to positively influencing the lives of my patients by equipping them with the tools to enhance their overall well-being.Work Experience
- University of Arizona- Banner Health (2021 - Ongoing)
Awards
- SSWIMS Fellowship
- University of Arizona, Summer 2024
- WIMS Torchbearer Award
- University of Arizona, Spring 2024
- Winter 2023
Licensure & Certification
- BCLS (2021)
- BLS (2021)
- Arizona State Medical License (2021)
- ABIM (2022)
Interests
Teaching
Chronic medical problems in primary Care Clinics such as Diabetes, Weight loss, Asthma/COPD.Rheumatological diagnosis, Preventative Healthcare
Research
Rheumatology in Primary care clinics, Value of care
Courses
No activities entered.
Scholarly Contributions
Journals/Publications
- Sandooja, R., Razik, R. A., Lim, J. M., Lao, N., Khalid, S., & Cha, M. (2021). Complication rates in emergent endoscopy for foreign bodies under different sedation modalities: A large single-center retrospective review.. World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 13(2), 45-55. doi:10.4253/wjge.v13.i2.45More infoForeign object ingestion (FOI) and food bolus impaction (FBI) are common causes of emergent endoscopic intervention. The choice of sedation used is often dictated by physician experience. Many endoscopists frequently prefer to use monitored anesthesia care (MAC) and general anesthesia (GA) as opposed to conscious sedation (CS) due to the concern for inadequate airway protection. However, there is insufficient data examining the safety of different sedation modalities in emergent endoscopic management of FOI and FBI..To investigate the complication rates of emergent endoscopic extraction performed under different sedation modalities..We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients presenting with acute FBI and FOI between 2010 and 2018 in two hospitals. A standardized questionnaire was utilized to collect data on demographics, endoscopic details, sedation practices, hospital stay and adverse events. Complications recognized during and within 24 h of the procedure were considered early, whereas patients presenting with a procedure-related adverse event within two weeks of the index event were considered delayed complications. Complication rates of patients who underwent emergent endoscopic retrieval were compared based on sedation types, namely CS, MAC and GA. Chi-square analysis and multiple logistic regression were used to compare complication rate based on sedation type..Among the 929 procedures analyzed, 353 procedures (38.0%) were performed under CS, 278 procedures (29.9%) under MAC and the rest (32.1%) under GA. The median age of the subjects was 52 years old, with 57.4% being male. The majority of the procedures (64.3%) were FBI with the rest being FOI (35.7%). A total of 132 subjects (14.2%) had chronic comorbidities while 29.0% had psychiatric disorders. The most commonly observed early complications were mucosal laceration (3.8%) and bleeding (2.6%). The most common delayed complication was aspiration pneumonia (1.8%). A total of 20 patients (5.6%) could not adequately be sedated with CS and had to be converted to MAC or GA. Patient sedated with MAC and GA were more likely to require hospitalization, P < 0.0001. Analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in the complication rate between patients sedated under CS (14.7%), MAC (14.7%) and GA (19.5%), P = 0.19..For patients who present with FOI or FBI and undergo emergent endoscopic treatment, there is no significant difference in adverse event rates between CS, MAC and GA.
- Cha, M. H., Razik, R., Khalid, S., Sandooja, R., & Khanzada, H. J. (2019). 529 The Effect of Sedation Modality on Outcomes in Emergent Endoscopic Intervention. The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 114(1), S306-S306. doi:10.14309/01.ajg.0000591648.12667.25
- Dale, M. L., Scott, E. P., Khalid, S., Eiseman, A. S., & Turner, T. H. (2019). "Feasibility and utility of a simple computerized test for measuring saccade latency in progressive supranuclear palsy- a proof-of-concept study".. Journal of clinical movement disorders, 6(1), 6. doi:10.1186/s40734-019-0081-2More infoReliable detection of slowed vertical saccades may help discriminate progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) from the subset of Parkinson's disease patients who lack tremor (akinetic-rigid or PD-postural instability and gait disorder PIGD subtype), and from age-related oculomotor changes. We investigated the feasibility of a camera-less computerized behavioral saccade latency paradigm previously validated in PD to discriminate probable PSP-Richardson syndrome (PSP-RS) from PD-PIGD and age-matched controls..In this proof-of-concept case-control study, reflexive saccade latencies were measured in 5 subjects with probable PSP-RS, 5 subjects with PD-PIGD subtype, and 5 age-matched controls using the behavioral paradigm. The battery was repeated approximately one month later. All subjects were examined off levodopa by a movement disorders neurologist and by an ophthalmologist, who also performed a dilated eye exam..Vertical prosaccade latencies were longer in the PSP group (median = 903 ms) relative to PD (median = 268 ms) and control groups (median = 235 ms), with no overlap between groups (100% accuracy). PSP subjects also had larger vertical-horizontal discrepancies than comparison groups. Test-retest reliability for the behavioral saccade measures was good (interclass correlation coefficient = 0.948; 95% confidence interval [0.856, 0.982]), and the measures strongly correlated with clinical ratings..Computerized behavioral measurement of reflexive saccade latency is feasible in PSP, and potentially discriminates probable PSP-RS from the PD-PIGD subtype. Findings from this proof-of-concept study support utility of the approach for obtaining objective saccade metrics in clinical evaluations and for tracking change in future, larger trials of moderately advanced PSP. Future studies should also examine the behavioral paradigm in earlier presentations of PSP and other subtypes of PSP.
Case Studies
- Khalid, S., & Ansaam, D. (2023. The future of IgG4 related Disease with Ofatumumab(p. 1).