
Keith Swisher
- Scholar, Law
- Director, BA in Law - Master in Legal Studies Programs
Contact
- (520) 621-1373
- COLLEGE OF LAW, Rm. 118B
- TUCSON, AZ 85721-0176
- keithswisher@arizona.edu
Bio
No activities entered.
Interests
No activities entered.
Courses
2025-26 Courses
-
Pro. Responsibility Legal Prac
LAW 410 (Fall 2025) -
Pro. Responsibility Legal Prac
LAW 510 (Fall 2025)
2024-25 Courses
-
Pro. Responsibility Legal Prac
LAW 410 (Summer I 2025) -
Pro. Responsibility Legal Prac
LAW 510 (Summer I 2025) -
Professional Responsibility
LAW 609 (Summer I 2025) -
Honors Independent Study
LAW 499H (Spring 2025) -
Honors Thesis
LAW 498H (Spring 2025) -
Pro. Responsibility Legal Prac
LAW 410 (Spring 2025) -
Pro. Responsibility Legal Prac
LAW 510 (Spring 2025) -
Pro. Responsibility Legal Prac
LAW 410 (Fall 2024) -
Pro. Responsibility Legal Prac
LAW 510 (Fall 2024)
2023-24 Courses
-
Pro. Responsibility Legal Prac
LAW 410 (Summer I 2024) -
Pro. Responsibility Legal Prac
LAW 510 (Summer I 2024) -
Professional Responsibility
LAW 609 (Summer I 2024) -
Pro. Responsibility Legal Prac
LAW 410 (Spring 2024) -
Pro. Responsibility Legal Prac
LAW 510 (Spring 2024) -
Pro. Responsibility Legal Prac
LAW 410 (Fall 2023) -
Pro. Responsibility Legal Prac
LAW 510 (Fall 2023) -
Professional Responsibility
LAW 609 (Fall 2023)
2022-23 Courses
-
Pro. Responsibility Legal Prac
LAW 410 (Summer I 2023) -
Pro. Responsibility Legal Prac
LAW 510 (Summer I 2023) -
Law Journal
LAW 496 (Spring 2023) -
Pro. Responsibility Legal Prac
LAW 410 (Spring 2023) -
Pro. Responsibility Legal Prac
LAW 510 (Spring 2023) -
Professional Responsibility
LAW 609 (Spring 2023) -
Pro. Responsibility Legal Prac
LAW 410 (Fall 2022) -
Pro. Responsibility Legal Prac
LAW 510 (Fall 2022)
2021-22 Courses
-
Pro. Responsibility Legal Prac
LAW 410 (Summer I 2022) -
Pro. Responsibility Legal Prac
LAW 510 (Summer I 2022) -
Professional Responsibility
LAW 609 (Fall 2021)
2020-21 Courses
-
Independent Study
LAW 599 (Summer I 2021) -
Professional Responsibility
LAW 609 (Summer I 2021) -
Honors Thesis
LAW 498H (Spring 2021) -
Law Journal
LAW 496 (Spring 2021) -
Legal Analysis Writing & Rsrch
LAW 507 (Spring 2021) -
Procedure
LAW 501 (Spring 2021) -
Honors Thesis
LAW 498H (Fall 2020)
2019-20 Courses
-
Professional Responsibility
LAW 609 (Summer I 2020) -
Law Journal
LAW 496 (Spring 2020) -
Professional Responsibility
LAW 609 (Spring 2020) -
Special Topics in the Law
LAW 495 (Spring 2020) -
Directed Study
LAW 492 (Fall 2019) -
Procedure
LAW 401 (Fall 2019) -
Procedure
LAW 501 (Fall 2019) -
Professional Responsibility
LAW 609 (Fall 2019)
2018-19 Courses
-
Independent Study
LAW 499 (Summer I 2019) -
Legal Internship
LAW 493A (Summer I 2019) -
Honors Thesis
LAW 498H (Spring 2019) -
Legal Internship
LAW 493A (Spring 2019) -
Professional Responsibility
LAW 609 (Spring 2019) -
Special Topics in the Law
LAW 495 (Spring 2019) -
Directed Study
LAW 492 (Fall 2018) -
Honors Thesis
LAW 498H (Fall 2018) -
Independent Study
LAW 499 (Fall 2018) -
Legal Internship
LAW 493A (Fall 2018) -
Procedure
LAW 401 (Fall 2018) -
Procedure
LAW 501 (Fall 2018)
2017-18 Courses
-
Legal Internship
LAW 493A (Summer I 2018) -
Honors Thesis
LAW 498H (Spring 2018) -
Legal Internship
LAW 493A (Spring 2018) -
Procedure
LAW 401 (Spring 2018) -
Procedure
LAW 501 (Spring 2018) -
Honors Thesis
LAW 498H (Fall 2017) -
Legal Internship
LAW 493A (Fall 2017)
2016-17 Courses
-
Congressional Internship
LAW 493B (Summer I 2017) -
Legal Internship
LAW 493A (Summer I 2017)
2015-16 Courses
-
Procedure
LAW 401 (Spring 2016) -
Procedure
LAW 501 (Spring 2016) -
The Legal Profession
LAW 609 (Spring 2016)
Scholarly Contributions
Chapters
- Swisher, K. A. (2023). Biennial Supplement. In Judicial Conduct and Ethics (6th ed.). LexisNexis.More infoMy coauthors and I completed the biennial supplement for the treatise, Judicial Conduct and Ethics (Lexis)
Journals/Publications
- Swisher, K. (2024). ALGORITHMIC JUDICIAL ETHICS. Wisconsin Law Review, 2024(Issue 4). doi:10.59015/wlr.vllw7889More infoJudges have a brand-new bag—an algorithmic accessory in criminal adjudication. It scores criminal defendants, aiming to inform judges which defendants are likely reoffenders or flight risks and which ones are not. The downsides, however, include that the algorithms score defendants primarily on the basis of other defendants’ (mis)conduct and that certain races effectively score lower than other races. This article explores these algorithmic developments in criminal courts across the country and makes four contributions: (1) a survey and preliminary application of judicial ethics to this development; (2) a preliminary moral argument, informed by related judicial ethics and legal standards, suggesting that judges should use these algorithmic tools only to help, not hurt, individual defendants; (3) an approach to judicial decision-making in the shadow of structural injustice that promises to deal less algorithmic damage to defendants and their family members; and (4) a technical constraint on algorithmic design that ensures equal (indeed, better than equal) protection on the basis of race.