Jump to navigation

The University of Arizona Wordmark Line Logo White
UA Profiles | Home
  • Phonebook
  • Edit My Profile
  • Feedback

Profiles search form

Leila F.S. Barraza

  • Department Chair, Public Health Practice, Policy & Translational Research
  • Professor, Public Health
  • Director, Arizona Health Education Centers
  • Member of the Graduate Faculty
Contact
  • lbarraza@arizona.edu
  • Bio
  • Interests
  • Courses
  • Scholarly Contributions

Degrees

  • J.D.
    • Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
  • MPH Family and Child Health
    • University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
  • B.A. Biological Sciences
    • University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California

Awards

  • Excellence in Teaching (Online)
    • Zuckerman College of Public Health, Fall 2021

Licensure & Certification

  • Arizona State Bar License, Arizona State Bar (2009)

Related Links

Share Profile

Interests

Teaching

Public Health Law, Policy, and Ethics

Research

Impact of laws and policies on public health

Courses

2025-26 Courses

  • Dissertation
    PHPM 920 (Spring 2026)
  • Honors Thesis
    PPEL 498H (Spring 2026)
  • Independent Study
    LAW 699 (Spring 2026)
  • Phpm Field Seminar
    PHPM 696P (Spring 2026)
  • Public Health Law and Ethics
    LAW 608A (Spring 2026)
  • Public Health Law and Ethics
    PHPM 608A (Spring 2026)
  • Dissertation
    PHPM 920 (Fall 2025)
  • Honors Thesis
    PPEL 498H (Fall 2025)
  • Master's Report
    PHPM 909 (Fall 2025)

2024-25 Courses

  • Master's Report
    PHPM 909 (Summer I 2025)
  • Public Health Law and Ethics
    LAW 608A (Summer I 2025)
  • Public Health Law and Ethics
    PHPM 608A (Summer I 2025)
  • Phpm Field Seminar
    PHPM 696P (Spring 2025)
  • Public Health Law and Ethics
    LAW 608A (Spring 2025)
  • Public Health Law and Ethics
    PHPM 608A (Spring 2025)
  • Master's Report
    PHPM 909 (Fall 2024)

2023-24 Courses

  • Master's Report
    PHPM 909 (Summer I 2024)
  • Public Health Law and Ethics
    LAW 608A (Summer I 2024)
  • Public Health Law and Ethics
    PHPM 608A (Summer I 2024)
  • Master's Report
    PHPM 909 (Spring 2024)
  • Phpm Field Seminar
    PHPM 696P (Spring 2024)
  • Public Health Law and Ethics
    LAW 608A (Spring 2024)
  • Public Health Law and Ethics
    PHPM 608A (Spring 2024)
  • Independent Study
    PHPM 599 (Fall 2023)

2022-23 Courses

  • Public Health Law and Ethics
    LAW 608A (Summer I 2023)
  • Public Health Law and Ethics
    PHPM 608A (Summer I 2023)
  • Master's Report
    PHPM 909 (Spring 2023)
  • Phpm Field Seminar
    PHPM 696P (Spring 2023)
  • Public Health Law and Ethics
    LAW 608A (Spring 2023)
  • Public Health Law and Ethics
    PHPM 608A (Spring 2023)
  • Substantial Paper
    LAW 692 (Spring 2023)

2021-22 Courses

  • Master's Report
    PHPM 909 (Summer I 2022)
  • Public Health Law and Ethics
    LAW 608A (Summer I 2022)
  • Public Health Law and Ethics
    PHPM 608A (Summer I 2022)
  • Dissertation
    PHPM 920 (Spring 2022)
  • Master's Report
    PHPM 909 (Spring 2022)
  • Phpm Field Seminar
    PHPM 696P (Spring 2022)
  • Public Health Law and Ethics
    LAW 608A (Spring 2022)
  • Public Health Law and Ethics
    PHPM 608A (Spring 2022)
  • Dissertation
    PHPM 920 (Fall 2021)
  • Master's Report
    PHPM 909 (Fall 2021)

2020-21 Courses

  • Dissertation
    PHPM 920 (Summer I 2021)
  • Master's Report
    PHPM 909 (Summer I 2021)
  • Public Health Law and Ethics
    LAW 608A (Summer I 2021)
  • Public Health Law and Ethics
    PHPM 608A (Summer I 2021)
  • Dissertation
    PHPM 920 (Spring 2021)
  • Master's Report
    PHPM 909 (Spring 2021)
  • Phpm Field Seminar
    PHPM 696P (Spring 2021)
  • Public Health Law and Ethics
    LAW 608A (Spring 2021)
  • Public Health Law and Ethics
    PHPM 608A (Spring 2021)
  • Dissertation
    PHPM 920 (Fall 2020)

2019-20 Courses

  • Dissertation
    PHPM 920 (Summer I 2020)
  • Independent Study
    LAW 699 (Summer I 2020)
  • Master's Report
    PHPM 909 (Summer I 2020)
  • Public Health Law and Ethics
    LAW 608A (Summer I 2020)
  • Public Health Law and Ethics
    PHPM 608A (Summer I 2020)
  • Dissertation
    PHPM 920 (Spring 2020)
  • Honors Thesis
    HNRS 498H (Spring 2020)
  • Phpm Field Seminar
    PHPM 696P (Spring 2020)
  • Public Health Law and Ethics
    LAW 608A (Spring 2020)
  • Public Health Law and Ethics
    PHPM 608A (Spring 2020)
  • Dissertation
    PHPM 920 (Fall 2019)
  • Regulatory Science
    LAW 695D (Fall 2019)
  • Regulatory Science
    PCOL 695D (Fall 2019)
  • Regulatory Science
    PHPM 695D (Fall 2019)

2018-19 Courses

  • Public Health Law and Ethics
    LAW 608A (Summer I 2019)
  • Public Health Law and Ethics
    PHPM 608A (Summer I 2019)
  • Rural Hlth Svs Lrng Inst
    PHPM 597D (Summer I 2019)
  • Dissertation
    PHPM 920 (Spring 2019)
  • Honors Thesis
    HNRS 498H (Spring 2019)
  • Honors Thesis
    PPEL 498H (Spring 2019)
  • Master's Report
    PHPM 909 (Spring 2019)
  • Public Health Law and Ethics
    LAW 608A (Spring 2019)
  • Public Health Law and Ethics
    PHPM 608A (Spring 2019)
  • Regulatory Science
    LAW 695D (Spring 2019)
  • Regulatory Science
    PCOL 695D (Spring 2019)
  • Dissertation
    PHPM 920 (Fall 2018)
  • Honors Thesis
    PPEL 498H (Fall 2018)
  • Master's Report
    PHPM 909 (Fall 2018)
  • Regulatory Science
    LAW 695D (Fall 2018)
  • Regulatory Science
    PCOL 695D (Fall 2018)
  • Regulatory Science
    PHPM 695D (Fall 2018)
  • Regulatory Science
    PHSC 695D (Fall 2018)

2017-18 Courses

  • Master's Report
    PHPM 909 (Summer I 2018)
  • Public Health Law and Ethics
    PHPM 608A (Summer I 2018)
  • Dissertation
    PHPM 920 (Spring 2018)
  • Master's Report
    PHPM 909 (Spring 2018)
  • Phpm Field Seminar
    PHPM 696P (Spring 2018)
  • Public Health Law and Ethics
    LAW 608A (Spring 2018)
  • Public Health Law and Ethics
    PHPM 608A (Spring 2018)
  • Regulatory Science
    LAW 695D (Spring 2018)
  • Regulatory Science
    PCOL 695D (Spring 2018)
  • Regulatory Science
    PHPM 695D (Spring 2018)
  • Dissertation
    PHPM 920 (Fall 2017)
  • Master's Report
    PHPM 909 (Fall 2017)
  • Regulatory Science
    EPID 695D (Fall 2017)
  • Regulatory Science
    LAW 695D (Fall 2017)

2016-17 Courses

  • Master's Report
    CPH 909 (Summer I 2017)
  • Public Health Law and Ethics
    CPH 608A (Summer I 2017)
  • Rural Hlth Svs Lrng Inst
    CPH 597D (Summer I 2017)
  • Dissertation
    CPH 920 (Spring 2017)
  • Master's Report
    CPH 909 (Spring 2017)
  • Public Health Law and Ethics
    CPH 608A (Spring 2017)
  • Public Health Law and Ethics
    LAW 608A (Spring 2017)
  • Regulatory Science
    CPH 695D (Spring 2017)
  • Regulatory Science
    LAW 695D (Spring 2017)
  • Regulatory Science
    PHSC 695D (Spring 2017)
  • Regulatory Science
    LAW 695D (Fall 2016)
  • Regulatory Science
    PHSC 695D (Fall 2016)

2015-16 Courses

  • Master's Report
    CPH 909 (Summer I 2016)
  • Rural Hlth Svs Lrng Inst
    CPH 597D (Summer I 2016)
  • Master's Report
    CPH 909 (Spring 2016)
  • Public Health Law and Ethics
    CPH 608A (Spring 2016)
  • Public Health Law and Ethics
    LAW 608A (Spring 2016)

Related Links

UA Course Catalog

Scholarly Contributions

Journals/Publications

  • Mantina, N. M., Smith, J., Miiro, F. N., Magrath, P. A., McClelland, D. J., Barraza, L., Ruiz, J., & Madhivanan, P. (2025). Perspectives of HPV vaccine decision-making among young adults: A qualitative systematic review and evidence synthesis. PLoS ONE, 20(Issue 5). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0321448
    More info
    Background Despite the demonstrated safety and effectiveness of HPV vaccines in preventing HPV-related cancers, global vaccine coverage remains low. The suboptimal adolescent HPV vaccine coverage rate leaves many young adults at increased risk for developing vaccine preventable HPV-related cancers. This qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) aims to examine the HPV vaccination perspectives of young adults globally and identify the barriers and facilitators to HPV vaccine uptake and decision-making processes. Methods A comprehensive search was conducted on October 2023 across seven databases to identify studies that reported on HPV vaccination among young adults aged 18–26 years and used qualitive study methods or analysis techniques. Results Forty-two studies were purposively sampled for inclusion, presenting 29 findings across 10 thematic categories. Vaccine eligible young adults believed that they had aged out of eligibility for HPV vaccination. There was also a perspective that condom use, and regular screenings were alternatives to vaccination in preventing HPV infections. Challenges included scheduling appointments, requirements for multiple shots, and vaccine cost. There was also concern for the gendered nature of vaccine promotion. Lastly, despite being at the age to make autonomous decisions, parents were still influential and active in the vaccine decision-making process for their children. Conclusion The novelty of this study, as one of the principal QES on catch-up HPV vaccination, presents findings that underscore the complexity of factors across multiple ecological levels which may aid or impede vaccination uptake among young adults and provide important considerations for interventions, programs, and policies aimed at addressing HPV vaccination disparities among young adults.
  • Hodge, J. G., Piatt, J., White, E., Barraza, L. F., & Berthiaume, K. (2024).

    Supreme Court Impacts in Public Health Law: 2023-2024

    . JLME. doi:doi:10.1017/jme.2024.120
  • Hodge, J., Piatt, J., White, E., Barraza, L., & Berthiaume, K. (2024). Supreme Court Impacts in Public Health Law: 2023-2024 Public Health and the Law. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 52(2). doi:10.1017/jme.2024.120
    More info
    In a “mixed bag” 2023-2024 session, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a series of decisions both favorable and antithetical to public health and safety. Taking on tough constitutional issues implicating gun control, misinformation, and homelessness, the Court also avoided substantive reviews in favor of procedural dismissals in key cases involving reproductive rights and government censorship.
  • Barraza, L. F., Austhof, E., Khan, S. M., Kelley, C., Shilen, A., Ernst, K. C., Cordova, F. M., Pogreba Brown, K. M., Jacobs, E. T., & Hall-Lipsy, E. A. (2023). Differences in Perceptions of Individual and Government-Level COVID-19 Prevention Measures Based on Vaccine Willingness. Journal of Health Care Law & Policy, 26(1), 87-104.
  • Barraza, L. F., Kahn, S., Shilen, A., Austhof, E., Cordova, F. M., Ernst, K. C., Heslin, K., Kelly, C., Pogreba Brown, K. M., Jacobs, E. T., & Hall-Lipsy, E. A. (2023). Differences in Perceptions of Individual and Government-Level COVID-19 Prevention Measures Based on Vaccine Willingness.. Journal of Heath Care Law & Policy.
  • Hall-Lipsy, E. A., Jacobs, E., Cordova, F. M., Pogreba Brown, K. M., Ernst, K. C., Shilen, A., Kelley, C. P., Khan, S., Austhof, E. C., & Barraza, L. F. (2023). Differences in Perceptions of Individual and Government-Level COVID-19 Prevention Measures Based on Vaccine Willingness. J Health Care L & Policy, 26(87).
  • Hodge, J. G., Barraza, L., Piatt, J. L., & White, E. N. (2023). Midterm Maelstrom: Public Health Legal Impacts of Election 2022. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 51(Issue 1). doi:10.1017/jme.2023.57
    More info
    Among the morass of critical issues impacting the results of the midterm elections in 2022 were core public health issues related to health care access, justice, and reforms. Collectively, voters' communal health and safety concerns dominated outcomes in key races which may shape national, state, and local legal approaches to protecting the public's health in the modern era.
  • Hodge, J. G., Barraza, L., Piatt, J. L., & White, E. N. (2023). Midterm Maelstrom: Public Health Legal Impacts of Election 2022. The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 51(1), 208-212.
    More info
    Among the morass of critical issues impacting the results of the midterm elections in 2022 were core public health issues related to health care access, justice, and reforms. Collectively, voters' communal health and safety concerns dominated outcomes in key races which may shape national, state, and local legal approaches to protecting the public's health in the modern era.
  • Hodge, J. G., Barraza, L., Piatt, J. L., White, E. N., Ghaith, S., Hollinshead, S., Krumholz, L., Puchebner, M., & Smith, E. (2023). Supreme Court Impacts in Public Health Law: 2022-2023. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 51(Issue 3). doi:10.1017/jme.2023.105
    More info
    In another tumultuous term of the United States Supreme Court in 2022-2023 a series of critical cases implicate instant and forthcoming changes in multiple fronts that collectively shift the national public health law and policy environment.
  • Hodge, J. G., Barraza, L., Piatt, J. L., White, E. N., Ghaith, S., Hollinshead, S., Krumholz, L., Puchebner, M., & Smith, E. (2023). Supreme Court Impacts in Public Health Law: 2022-2023. The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 51(3), 684-688.
    More info
    In another tumultuous term of the United States Supreme Court in 2022-2023 a series of critical cases implicate instant and forthcoming changes in multiple fronts that collectively shift the national public health law and policy environment.
  • Lent, A. B., Derksen, D., Jacobs, E. T., Barraza, L., & Calhoun, E. A. (2023). Policy Recommendations for Improving Rural Cancer Services in the United States. JCO Oncology Practice, 19(Issue 5). doi:10.1200/op.22.00704
    More info
    Compared with urban residents, rural Americans have seen slower declines in cancer deaths, have lower incidence but higher death rates from cancers that can be prevented through screening, have lower screening rates, are more likely to present with later-stage cancers, and have poorer cancer outcomes and lower survival. Rural health provider shortages and lack of cancer services may explain some disparities. The literature was reviewed to identify factors contributing to rural health care capacity shortages and propose policy recommendations for improving rural cancer care. Uncompensated care, unfavorable payer mix, and low patient volume impede rural physician recruitment and retainment. Students from rural areas are more likely to practice there but are less likely to attend medical school because of lower graduation rates, grades, and Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) scores versus urban students. The cancer care infrastructure is costly and financially challenging in rural areas with high proportions of uninsured and publicly insured patients. A lack of data on oncology providers and equipment impedes coordinated efforts to address rural shortages. Graduate Medical Education funding greatly favors large, urban, tertiary care teaching hospitals over residency training in rural, critical access and community-based hospitals and clinics. Policies have the potential to transform rural health care. This includes increasing advanced practice provider postgraduate oncology training opportunities and expanding the scope of practice; improving health workforce and services data collection and aggregation; transforming graduate medical education subsidies to support rural student recruitment and rural training opportunities; and expanding federal and state financial incentives and payments to support the rural cancer infrastructure.
  • Lent, A. B., Derksen, D., Jacobs, E. T., Barraza, L., & Calhoun, E. A. (2023). Policy Recommendations for Improving Rural Cancer Services in the United States. JCO oncology practice, 19(5), 288-294.
    More info
    Compared with urban residents, rural Americans have seen slower declines in cancer deaths, have lower incidence but higher death rates from cancers that can be prevented through screening, have lower screening rates, are more likely to present with later-stage cancers, and have poorer cancer outcomes and lower survival. Rural health provider shortages and lack of cancer services may explain some disparities. The literature was reviewed to identify factors contributing to rural health care capacity shortages and propose policy recommendations for improving rural cancer care. Uncompensated care, unfavorable payer mix, and low patient volume impede rural physician recruitment and retainment. Students from rural areas are more likely to practice there but are less likely to attend medical school because of lower graduation rates, grades, and Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) scores versus urban students. The cancer care infrastructure is costly and financially challenging in rural areas with high proportions of uninsured and publicly insured patients. A lack of data on oncology providers and equipment impedes coordinated efforts to address rural shortages. Graduate Medical Education funding greatly favors large, urban, tertiary care teaching hospitals over residency training in rural, critical access and community-based hospitals and clinics. Policies have the potential to transform rural health care. This includes increasing advanced practice provider postgraduate oncology training opportunities and expanding the scope of practice; improving health workforce and services data collection and aggregation; transforming graduate medical education subsidies to support rural student recruitment and rural training opportunities; and expanding federal and state financial incentives and payments to support the rural cancer infrastructure.
  • Hodge, J. G., Piatt, J. L., Barraza, L., & White, E. N. (2022). Regressive Federalism, Rights Reversals, and the Public's Health. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 50(Issue 2). doi:10.1017/jme.2022.65
    More info
    As the United States emerges from the worst public health threat it has ever experienced, the Supreme Court is poised to reconsider constitutional principles from bygone eras. Judicial proposals to roll back rights under a federalism infrastructure grounded in states' interests threaten the nation's legal fabric at a precarious time. This column explores judicial shifts in 3 key public health contexts - reproductive rights, vaccinations, and national security - and their repercussions.
  • Hodge, J. G., Piatt, J. L., Barraza, L., & White, E. N. (2022). Regressive Federalism, Rights Reversals, and the Public's Health. The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 50(2), 375-379.
    More info
    As the United States emerges from the worst public health threat it has ever experienced, the Supreme Court is poised to reconsider constitutional principles from bygone eras. Judicial proposals to roll back rights under a federalism infrastructure grounded in states' interests threaten the nation's legal fabric at a precarious time. This column explores judicial shifts in 3 key public health contexts - reproductive rights, vaccinations, and national security - and their repercussions.
  • Hodge, J. G., Piatt, J., Barraza, L. F., & White, E. (2022). Regressive Federalism, Rights Reversals, and the Public’s Health.. Journal of Law, Medicine, & Ethics, 50(2), 384=388.
  • Leybas Nuño, V., Mantina, N. M., Dawodu, O., Dykinga, M., Carr, D. L., Pogreba-Brown, K., Cordova-Marks, F., Jehn, M., Peace-Tuskey, K., Barraza, L., & Garcia-Filion, P. (2022). Consequences of COVID-19 on adolescents in Arizona: A longitudinal study protocol. Frontiers in Public Health, 10(Issue). doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.945089
    More info
    Introduction: The long-term impact of COVID-19 is unknown. We developed a 5-year prospective cohort study designed to generate actionable community-informed research about the consequences of COVID-19 on adolescents ages 12–17 years in Arizona. Methods: The study has two primary outcomes: 1) acute and long-term outcomes of COVID-19 illness and 2) symptoms of depression and anxiety. Data is collected using an online survey with plans to integrate qualitative data collection methods. The survey is administered at baseline, 4, and 8 months in year one, and annually in years two through five. This study is informed by Intersectionality Theory, which considers the diverse identities adolescents have that are self and socially defined and the influence they have collectively and simultaneously. To this end, a sample of variables collected is race/ethnicity, language usage, generational status, co-occurring health conditions, and gender. Additional measures capture experiences in social contexts such as home (parent employment, food, and housing security), school (remote learning, type of school), and society (racism). Results: Findings are not presented because the manuscript is a protocol designed to describe the procedure instead of report results. Discussion: The unique contributions of the study is its focus on COVID-19 the illness and COVID-19 the socially experienced pandemic and the impact of both on adolescents.
  • Leybas Nuño, V., Mantina, N. M., Dawodu, O., Dykinga, M., Carr, D. L., Pogreba-Brown, K., Cordova-Marks, F., Jehn, M., Peace-Tuskey, K., Barraza, L., & Garcia-Filion, P. (2022). Consequences of COVID-19 on adolescents in Arizona: A longitudinal study protocol. Frontiers in public health, 10, 945089.
    More info
    The long-term impact of COVID-19 is unknown. We developed a 5-year prospective cohort study designed to generate actionable community-informed research about the consequences of COVID-19 on adolescents ages 12-17 years in Arizona.
  • Nuno, V. L., Mantina, N. M., Dawodu, O., Dykinga, M., Carr, D. L., Pogreba Brown, K. M., Cordova, F. M., Jehn, M., Peace-Tuskey, K., Barraza, L. F., & Garcia, P. C. (2022). Consequences of COVID-19 on adolescents in Arizona: A longitudinal study protocol. . Frontiers in Public Health.
  • Axon, D. R., Slack, M., Barraza, L., Lee, J. K., & Warholak, T. (2021). Nationally Representative Health Care Expenditures of Community-Based Older Adults with Pain in the United States Prescribed Opioids vs Those Not Prescribed Opioids. Pain Medicine (United States), 22(Issue 2). doi:10.1093/pm/pnaa114
    More info
    Objective: To compare health care expenditures between older US adults (≥50 years) with pain who were prescribed opioid medications and those who were not. Design: Cross-sectional. Setting: Community-based adults in the 2015 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). Subjects: Nationally representative sample of US adults alive for the calendar year, aged 50 years or older, who reported having pain in the past four weeks. Methods: Older US adults (≥50 years) with pain in the 2015 MEPS data were identified. The key independent variable was opioid prescription status (prescribed opioid vs not prescribed opioid). Hierarchical linear regression models assessed health care expenditures (inpatient, outpatient, office-based, emergency room, prescription medications, other, and total) in US dollars for opioid prescription status from a community-dwelling US population perspective, adjusting for covariates. Results: The 2015 study cohort provided a national estimate of 50,898,592 noninstitutionalized US adults aged ≥50 years with pain in the past four weeks (prescribed opioid N = 16,757,516 [32.9%], not prescribed opioid N = 34,141,076 [67.1%]). After adjusting for covariates, individuals prescribed an opioid had 61% greater outpatient (β = 0.477, P < 0.0001), 69% greater office-based (β = 0.524, P < 0.0001), 14% greater emergency room (β = 0.131, P = 0.0045), 63% greater prescription medication (β = 0.486, P < 0.0001), 29% greater other (β = 0.251, P = 0.0002), and 105% greater total (β = 0.718, P < 0.0001) health care expenditures. There was no difference in opioid prescription status for inpatient expenditures (P > 0.05). Conclusions: This study raises awareness of the economic impact associated with opioid use among US older adults with pain. Future research should investigate these variables in greater depth, over longer time periods, and in additional populations.
  • Catalfamo, C. J., Heslin, K. M., Shilen, A., Khan, S. M., Hunsaker, J. R., Austhof, E., Barraza, L., Cordova-Marks, F. M., Farland, L. V., Garcia-Filion, P., Hoskinson, J., Jehn, M., Kohler, L. N., Lutrick, K., Harris, R. B., Chen, Z., Klimentidis, Y. C., Bell, M. L., Ernst, K. C., , Jacobs, E. T., et al. (2021). Design of the Arizona CoVHORT: A Population-Based COVID-19 Cohort. Frontiers in Public Health, 9(Issue). doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.620060
    More info
    This study is a prospective, population-based cohort of individuals with a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection and those without past infection through multiple recruitment sources. The main study goal is to track health status over time, within the diverse populations of Arizona and to identify the long-term consequences of COVID-19 on health and well-being. A total of 2,881 study participants (16.2% with a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection) have been enrolled as of December 22, 2020, with a target enrollment of 10,000 participants and a planned follow-up of at least 2 years. This manuscript describes a scalable study design that utilizes a wide range of recruitment sources, leveraging electronic data collection to capture and link longitudinal participant data on the current and emerging issues associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. The cohort is built within a collaborative infrastructure that includes new and established partnerships with multiple stakeholders, including the state's public universities, local health departments, tribes, and tribal organizations. Challenges remain for ensuring recruitment of diverse participants and participant retention, although the electronic data management system and timing of participant contact can help to mitigate these problems.
  • Catalfamo, C. J., Heslin, K. M., Shilen, A., Khan, S. M., Hunsaker, J. R., Austhof, E., Barraza, L., Cordova-Marks, F. M., Farland, L. V., Garcia-Filion, P., Hoskinson, J., Jehn, M., Kohler, L. N., Lutrick, K., Harris, R. B., Chen, Z., Klimentidis, Y. C., Bell, M. L., Ernst, K. C., , Jacobs, E. T., et al. (2021). Design of the Arizona CoVHORT: A Population-Based COVID-19 Cohort. Frontiers in public health, 9, 620060.
    More info
    This study is a prospective, population-based cohort of individuals with a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection and those without past infection through multiple recruitment sources. The main study goal is to track health status over time, within the diverse populations of Arizona and to identify the long-term consequences of COVID-19 on health and well-being. A total of 2,881 study participants (16.2% with a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection) have been enrolled as of December 22, 2020, with a target enrollment of 10,000 participants and a planned follow-up of at least 2 years. This manuscript describes a scalable study design that utilizes a wide range of recruitment sources, leveraging electronic data collection to capture and link longitudinal participant data on the current and emerging issues associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. The cohort is built within a collaborative infrastructure that includes new and established partnerships with multiple stakeholders, including the state's public universities, local health departments, tribes, and tribal organizations. Challenges remain for ensuring recruitment of diverse participants and participant retention, although the electronic data management system and timing of participant contact can help to mitigate these problems.
  • Hodge, J. G., Piatt, J. L., & Barraza, L. (2021). Legal Interventions to Counter COVID-19 Denialism. The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 49(4), 677-682.
    More info
    A series of denialist state laws thwart efficacious public health emergency response efforts despite escalating impacts of the spread of the Delta variant during the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • Hodge, J. G., Piatt, J. L., & Barraza, L. (2021). Legal Interventions to Counter COVID-19 Denialism. The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 49(Issue 4). doi:10.1017/jme.2021.92
    More info
    A series of denialist state laws thwart efficacious public health emergency response efforts despite escalating impacts of the spread of the Delta variant during the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • Hodge, J. G., Piatt, J. L., Barraza, L., Freed, R., Ghaith, S., & Wells, N. (2021). Legal Challenges Underlying COVID-19 Vaccinations. The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 49(3), 495-499.
    More info
    Immunizing hundreds of millions against COVID- 19 through the most extensive national vaccine campaign ever undertaken in the United States has generated significant law and policy challenges.
  • Hodge, J. G., Piatt, J. L., Barraza, L., Freed, R., Ghaith, S., & Wells, N. (2021). Legal Challenges Underlying COVID-19 Vaccinations. The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 49(Issue 3). doi:10.1017/jme.2021.70
    More info
    Immunizing hundreds of millions against COVID- 19 through the most extensive national vaccine campaign ever undertaken in the United States has generated significant law and policy challenges.
  • Hodge, J., Piatt, J., Barraza, L. F., Freed, R., & Ghaith, S. (2021). Vaccinating Urban Populations in Response to COVID-19: Legal Challenges and Solutions. Fordham Urban Law Journal.
  • Lent, A. B., Mohan, P., Derksen, D., Cance, W. G., Barraza, L., Jacobs, E. T., & Calhoun, E. A. (2021). The association between breast cancer capacity and resources with incidence and mortality in Arizona's low populous counties. Rural and remote health, 21(3), 6357.
    More info
    While cancer deaths have decreased nationally, declines have been much slower in rural areas than in urban areas. Previous studies on rural cancer service capacity are limited to specific points along the cancer care continuum (eg screening, diagnosis or treatment) and require updating to capture the current rural health landscape since implementation of the 2010 Affordable Care Act in the USA. The association between current rural cancer service capacity across the cancer care continuum and cancer incidence and death is unclear. This cross-sectional study explored the association between breast cancer service capacity and incidence and mortality in Arizona's low populous counties.
  • Lent, A. B., Mohan, P., Derksen, D., Cance, W. G., Barraza, L., Jacobs, E. T., & Calhoun, E. A. (2021). The association between breast cancer capacity and. resources with incidence and mortality in Arizona's low populous counties. Rural and Remote Health, 21(Issue 3). doi:10.22605/rrh6357
    More info
    Introduction: While cancer deaths have decreased nationally, declines have been much slower in rural areas than in urban areas. Previous studies on rural cancer service capacity are limited to specific points along the cancer care continuum (eg screening, diagnosis or treatment) and require updating to capture the current rural health landscape since implementation of the 2010 Affordable Care Act in the USA. The association between current rural cancer service capacity across the cancer care continuum and cancer incidence and death is unclear. This cross-sectional study explored the association between breast cancer service capacity and incidence and mortality in Arizona's low populous counties. Methods: To measure county-level cancer capacity, clinical organizations operating within low populous areas of Arizona were surveyed to assess on-site breast cancer services provided (screening, diagnosis and treatment) and number of healthcare providers were pulled from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services National Provider Identifier database. The number of clinical sites and healthcare providers were converted to countylevel per capita rates. Rural-Urban Continuum codes were used to designate rural or urban county status. Age-adjusted county-level breast cancer incidence and death rates from 2010 to 2016 were obtained from the Arizona Department of Health Services, Arizona Cancer Registry. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the results. Multivariate regression was used to evaluate the association between cancer service capacity and incidence and mortality in 13 out of Arizona's 15 counties. Results: Rural counties had more per capita clinical sites (20.4) than urban counties (8.9) (p=0.02). Urban counties had more per capita pathologists (1.0) than rural counties (0) (p
  • Warholak, T. L., Lee, J. K., Barraza, L. F., Slack, M. K., & Axon, D. R. (2021). Nationally representative health care expenditures of community-based older adults with pain in the United States prescribed opioids versus those not prescribed opioids.. Pain Medicine., 22(2), 282-291. doi:10.1093/pm/pnaa114
  • Axon, D. R., Slack, M., Barraza, L., Lee, J. K., & Warholak, T. (2020). Nationally Representative Health Care Expenditures of Community-Based Older Adults with Pain in the United States Prescribed Opioids vs Those Not Prescribed Opioids. Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.).
    More info
    To compare health care expenditures between older US adults (≥50 years) with pain who were prescribed opioid medications and those who were not.
  • Barraza, L. F., Campos-Outcalt, D. E., & Reeves, C. (2020). Outcome of Coronavirus Disease 2019 on School Vaccination Policies for 2020-2021. JAMA Health Forum.
  • Barraza, L. F., Lebedevitch, C., & Stuebe, A. (2020). The Role of Law and Policy in Assisting Families to Reach Healthy People’s Maternal, Infant, and Child Health Breastfeeding Goals in the United States. HHS, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion.
  • Barraza, L., Reeves, C., & Campos-Outcalt, D. (2020). Outcome of Coronavirus Disease 2019 on School Vaccination Policies for 2020-2021. JAMA Health Forum, 1(Issue 8). doi:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2020.1018
  • Hodge, J., & Barraza, L. F. (2020). Violating People's Rights Is Not the Way to Address the Coronavirus. SLATE.
  • Barraza, L. F. (2019). Exploring Legal and Policy Responses to Opioids: America’s Worst Public Health Emergency.. South Carolina Law Review.
  • Barraza, L. F. (2019). Housing Rx: Policy Innovations and Opportunities for Action in New York State.. New York State Bar Association Health Law Journal.
  • Barraza, L., Hodge, J. G., Gulinson, C. L., Hensley, D., & Castagne, M. (2019). Immunization Laws and Policies Among U.S. Institutes of Higher Education. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 47(Issue 2). doi:10.1177/1073110519857292
  • Barraza, L., Hodge, J. G., Gulinson, C. L., Hensley, D., & Castagne, M. (2019). Immunization Laws and Policies Among U.S. Institutes of Higher Education. The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 47(2), 342-346.
  • Barraza, L., Reiss, D., & Freeman, P. (2019). Legal and Policy Responses to Vaccine-Preventable Disease Outbreaks. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 47(Issue 2). doi:10.1177/1073110519857307
    More info
    Laws and policies are vital tools in preventing outbreaks and limiting the further spread of disease, but they can vary in content and implementation. This manuscript provides insight into challenges in responding to recent vaccine-preventable disease outbreaks by examining legislative changes in California, policy changes on certain university campuses, and the laws implicated in a measles outbreak in Minnesota.
  • Barraza, L., Reiss, D., & Freeman, P. (2019). Legal and Policy Responses to Vaccine-Preventable Disease Outbreaks. The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 47(2_suppl), 11-14.
    More info
    Laws and policies are vital tools in preventing outbreaks and limiting the further spread of disease, but they can vary in content and implementation. This manuscript provides insight into challenges in responding to recent vaccine-preventable disease outbreaks by examining legislative changes in California, policy changes on certain university campuses, and the laws implicated in a measles outbreak in Minnesota.
  • Hodge, J. G., Barraza, L., Castagne, M., Fleming, H. K., & White, E. N. (2019). Major Health Law and Policy Positions Among 2020 Democratic Presidential Candidates. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 47(Issue 3). doi:10.1177/1073110519876181
  • Hodge, J. G., Barraza, L., Castagne, M., Fleming, H. K., & White, E. N. (2019). Major Health Law and Policy Positions Among 2020 Democratic Presidential Candidates. The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 47(3), 459-464.
  • Hodge, J. G., Gulinson, C. L., Barraza, L., Augur, H. R., Castagne, M., Cheff, A., Hensley, D., Sobek, M., & Weisberg, A. (2019). Innovative Law and Policy Responses to the Opioid Crisis. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 47(Issue 1). doi:10.1177/1073110519840498
  • Hodge, J. G., Gulinson, C. L., Barraza, L., Augur, H. R., Castagne, M., Cheff, A., Hensley, D., Sobek, M., & Weisberg, A. (2019). Innovative Law and Policy Responses to the Opioid Crisis. The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 47(1), 173-176.
  • Barraza, L. F., & Hall-Lipsy, E. A. (2018). Airport Public Health Preparedness and Response: Legal Rights, Powers, and Duties.. National Academies Press.
    More info
    http://www.trb.org/Publications/Blurbs/177931.aspx
  • Barraza, L., & Campos-Outcalt, D. (2018). More Research Needed to Increase Policies for HPV Vaccine Uptake. American journal of public health, 108(4), 430-431.
  • Barraza, L., & Campos-Outcalt, D. (2018). More research needed to increase policies for HPV vaccine uptake. American Journal of Public Health, 108(Issue 4). doi:10.2105/ajph.2018.304323
  • Garba, I., Barraza, L., & Hall-Lipsy, E. (2018). Acquired Duties for Ethical Research With American Indian/Alaska Native Populations: An Application of Pierson and Millum's Framework. The American journal of bioethics : AJOB, 18(11), 40-42.
  • Hall-Lipsy, E., Barraza, L., & Robertson, C. (2018). Practice-Based Research Networks and the Mandate for Real-World Evidence. American journal of law & medicine, 44(2-3), 219-236.
    More info
    The 21 Century Cures Act encourages the Food and Drug Administration to consider "real-world evidence" in its regulation of the safety and efficacy of drugs and devices. Many have interpreted this mandate to focus on non-randomized observational research. However, we suggest that regulatory science must also move from rarefied academic hospitals to community-based settings, where the vast majority of patients in fact receive care in the fragmented U.S. healthcare system. This move is especially important if innovations are to reach, and be validated in, more diverse populations. A solution can be found in the 183 Practiced-Based Research Networks ("PBRN"), i.e., groups of primary care clinicians and practices in all 50 states working to improve clinical care and translate research findings into practice. This symposium contribution seeks to (1) describe some of the common shortcomings of clinical trials, (2) explore the opportunities and challenges posed by use of real-world evidence as a basis for drug and device regulation, (3) briefly describe the history and evolution of PBRNs, and (4) articulate the challenges and opportunities for using PBRNs to fulfill the 21 Century Cures Act mandate for real-world evidence.
  • Hall-Lipsy, E., Barraza, L., & Robertson, C. (2018). Practice-based research networks and the mandate for real-world evidence. American Journal of Law and Medicine, 44(Issue 2-3). doi:10.1177/0098858818789428
    More info
    The 21st Century Cures Act encourages the Food and Drug Administration to consider “real-world evidence” in its regulation of the safety and efficacy of drugs and devices. Many have interpreted this mandate to focus on non-randomized observational research. However, we suggest that regulatory science must also move from rarefied academic hospitals to community-based settings, where the vast majority of patients in fact receive care in the fragmented U.S. healthcare system. This move is especially important if innovations are to reach, and be validated in, more diverse populations. A solution can be found in the 183 Practiced-Based Research Networks (“PBRN”), i.e., groups of primary care clinicians and practices in all 50 states working to improve clinical care and translate research findings into practice. This symposium contribution seeks to describe some of the common shortcomings of clinical trials, explore the opportunities and challenges posed by use of real-world evidence as a basis for drug and device regulation, briefly describe the history and evolution of PBRNs, and articulate the challenges and opportunities for using PBRNs to fulfill the 21st Century Cures Act mandate for real-world evidence.
  • Hodge, J. G., Wetter, S. A., Barraza, L., Morcelle, M., Chronister, D., Hess, A., Piatt, J., & Johnson, W. (2018). Emerging Legal Threats to the Public's Health. The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 46(2), 547-551.
  • Hodge, J. G., Wetter, S. A., Barraza, L., Morcelle, M., Chronister, D., Hess, A., Piatt, J., & Johnson, W. (2018). Emerging legal threats to the public’s health: Public health and the law. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 46(Issue 2). doi:10.1177/1073110518782969
  • Barraza, L. F., Weidenaar, K. E., Cook, L. T., Logue, A. R., & Halpern, M. T. (2017). Regulations and policies regarding e-cigarettes. Cancer, 123(16), 3007-3014.
    More info
    Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are a growing public health concern because of a dramatic increase in use by adolescents and the uncertainty of potential health impacts. These health concerns and lack of an established federal regulatory scheme have led many local and state governments to address the regulatory void for e-cigarettes by incorporating them into the statutory definition of tobacco or by passing laws specific to the use of e-cigarettes. In August 2016, the US Food and Drug Administration issued a final rule deeming e-cigarettes within their authority; providing uniform requirements like premarket approval applications, Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents reporting, and warning labels; and establishing 18 years as a minimum age of purchase. Although the impact on the public's health remains uncertain, regulations and laws governing e-cigarettes continue to develop. This review highlights the available data regarding safety and public health impacts of e-cigarettes and details the status of US regulations and policies affecting their sale and use. Cancer 2017;123:3007-14. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
  • Barraza, L., Schmit, C., & Hoss, A. (2017). The Latest in Vaccine Policies: Selected Issues in School Vaccinations, Healthcare Worker Vaccinations, and Pharmacist Vaccination Authority Laws. The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 45(1_suppl), 16-19.
    More info
    This paper discusses recent changes to state legal frameworks for mandatory vaccination in the context of school and healthcare worker vaccination. It then discusses state laws that allow pharmacists the authority to vaccinate.
  • Barraza, L., Schmit, C., & Hoss, A. (2017). The latest in vaccine policies: Selected issues in school vaccinations, healthcare worker vaccinations, and pharmacist vaccination authority laws. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 45(Issue 1). doi:10.1177/1073110517703307
  • Glenn, M., Zoph, O., Weidenaar, K., Barraza, L., Greco, W., Jenkins, K., Paode, P., & Fisher, J. (2017). State Regulation of Community Paramedicine Programs: A National Analysis. Prehospital emergency care : official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors, 1-8.
    More info
    Community Paramedicine (CP) is a rapidly evolving field within prehospital care where paramedics step outside of their traditional roles of treating acute conditions to provide elements of primary and preventive care. It is unclear if current state oversight regarding the scope of practice (SOP) for paramedics provides clear guidance on the novel functions provided and skills performed by CP programs.
  • Barraza, L., Weidenaar, K., Campos-Outcalt, D., & Yang, Y. T. (2016). Human Papillomavirus and Mandatory Immunization Laws: What Can We Learn From Early Mandates?. Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974), 131(5), 728-731.
  • Barraza, L., Weidenaar, K., Campos-Outcalt, D., & Yang, Y. T. (2016). Human papillomavirus and mandatory immunization laws: What can we learn from early mandates?. Public Health Reports, 131(Issue 5). doi:10.1177/0033354916663184
  • Hodge, J. G., & Barraza, L. F. (2016). Legal regulation of sodium consumption to reduce chronic conditions. Preventing Chronic Disease, 13(Issue 2). doi:10.5888/pcd13.150545
    More info
    In the United States, tens of thousands of Americans die each year of heart disease, stroke, or other chronic conditions tied to hypertension from long-term overconsumption of sodium compounds. Major strides to lower dietary sodium have been made over decades, but the goal of reducing Americans' daily consumption is elusive. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been urged to consider stronger regulatory limits on sodium, especially in processed and prepared foods. Still, FDA categorizes salt (and many other sodium compounds) as "generally recognized as safe," meaning they can be added to foods when ingested in reasonable amounts. Legal reforms or actions at each level of government offer traditional and new routes to improving chronic disease outcomes. However, using law as a public health tool must be assessed carefully, given potential trade-offs and unproven efficacy.
  • Hodge, J. G., & Barraza, L. F. (2016). Legal regulation of sodium consumption to reduce chronic conditions.. Preventing Chronic Disease, 13(E26), 1-4.
  • Barraza, L., Collmer, V., Meza, N., & Penunuri, K. (2015). The Legal Implications of HIPAA Privacy and Public Health Reporting for Correctional Facilities. Journal of Correctional Health Care, 21(Issue 3). doi:10.1177/1078345815585050
    More info
    Inmates in cramped living quarters, a situation common to correctional facilities, are especially vulnerable to disease. Cramped living conditions, coupled with above-average rates of HIV, tuberculosis, and other communicable diseases, increase inmates’ risk of problematic health outcomes. Thus, high-quality health care and sustained efforts to prevent disease are especially important to improve inmate health within correctional facilities. Compliance with federal privacy restrictions pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Privacy Rule and state disease reporting requirements will foster inmate health and assist efforts to prevent the spread of disease. This article examines the interplay between HIPAA rules and state reporting laws to preserve health information privacy and to control the spread of disease.
  • Barraza, L., Collmer, V., Meza, N., & Penunuri, K. (2015). The Legal Implications of HIPAA Privacy and Public Health Reporting for Correctional Facilities. Journal of correctional health care : the official journal of the National Commission on Correctional Health Care, 21(3), 213-21.
    More info
    Inmates in cramped living quarters, a situation common to correctional facilities, are especially vulnerable to disease. Cramped living conditions, coupled with above-average rates of HIV, tuberculosis, and other communicable diseases, increase inmates' risk of problematic health outcomes. Thus, high-quality health care and sustained efforts to prevent disease are especially important to improve inmate health within correctional facilities. Compliance with federal privacy restrictions pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Privacy Rule and state disease reporting requirements will foster inmate health and assist efforts to prevent the spread of disease. This article examines the interplay between HIPAA rules and state reporting laws to preserve health information privacy and to control the spread of disease.
  • Davidson, B., Sherman, S., Barraza, L., & Marinissen, M. J. (2015). Legal Challenges to the International Deployment of Government Public Health and Medical Personnel during Public Health Emergencies: Impact on National and Global Health Security. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 43(Issue 1). doi:10.1111/jlme.12229
    More info
    International deployment of government public health and medical personnel is often necessary to respond to emergencies and enhance global health security. However, there are unique legal challenges for donors and recipient countries. Here, we summarize some of those challenges and existing international fora that may help to identify solutions.
  • Davidson, B., Sherman, S., Barraza, L., & Marinissen, M. J. (2015). Legal challenges to the international deployment of government public health and medical personnel during public health emergencies: impact on national and global health security. The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 43 Suppl 1, 103-6.
  • Hodge, J. G., Barraza, L. F., Weidenaar, K., Corbett, A., Measer, G., & Agrawal, A. (2015). Efficacy in Emergency Legal Preparedness Underlying the 2014 Ebola Outbreak. Texas A&M Law Review, 2, 353-383.
  • Hodge, J. G., Weidenaar, K., Baker-White, A., Barraza, L., Bauerly, B. C., Corbett, A., Davis, C., Frey, L. T., Griest, M. M., Healy, C., Krueger, J., Lowrey, K. M., & Tilburg, W. (2015). Legal Innovations to Advance a Culture of Health. The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 43(4), 904-12.
    More info
    As conceptualized by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and its partners, a culture of health centers on a society in which health flourishes across all populations and sectors. Law, among other tools, is critical to advancing a culture of health across multiple arenas. In this manuscript, Network for Public Health Law colleagues illustrate how legal innovations at all levels of government contribute to societal health. Examples include modern laws that promote healthy and safe low-income housing, telemedicine reimbursement, paid sick and safe time, healthy food and beverages, reduced smoking rates, child vaccinations, universal pre-k, adolescents' healthy sleep, overdose prevention, and medical-legal partnerships.
  • Hodge, J. G., Weidenaar, K., Baker-White, A., Barraza, L., Bauerly, B. C., Corbett, A., Davis, C., Frey, L. T., Griest, M. M., Healy, C., Krueger, J., Lowrey, K. M., & Tilburg, W. (2015). Legal Innovations to Advance a Culture of Health. The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 43(Issue 4). doi:10.1111/jlme.12328
    More info
    As conceptualized by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and its partners, a culture of health centers on a society in which health flourishes across all populations and sectors. Law, among other tools, is critical to advancing a culture of health across multiple arenas. In this manuscript, Network for Public Health Law colleagues illustrate how legal innovations at all levels of government contribute to societal health. Examples include modern laws that promote healthy and safe low-income housing, telemedicine reimbursement, paid sick and safe time, healthy food and beverages, reduced smoking rates, child vaccinations, universal pre-k, adolescents' healthy sleep, overdose prevention, and medical-legal partnerships.
  • Yang, Y. T., Barraza, L., & Weidenaar, K. (2015). Measles Outbreak as a Catalyst for Stricter Vaccine Exemption Legislation. JAMA, 314(12), 1229-30.
  • Yang, Y. T., Barraza, L., & Weidenaar, K. (2015). Measles outbreak as a catalyst for stricter vaccine exemption legislation. JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association, 314(Issue 12). doi:10.1001/jama.2015.9579
  • Barraza, L. F., & Burkhart, L. (2014). The Expansion of Newborn Screening: Implications for Public Health and Policy. Annals of Health Law, 23, 42-58.
  • Hodge, J. G., Barraza, L. F., Measer, G., & Agrawal, A. (2014). Emergency Legal Responses to the 2014 Ebola Outbreak. Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics.
  • Hodge, J. G., Barraza, L. F., Russo, S., Nelson, K., & Measer, G. (2014). A Proposed Ban on the Sale to and Possession of Caloric Sweetened Beverages by Minors in Public. Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics, 42, 110-114.
  • Hodge, J. G., Barraza, L., Russo, S., Nelson, K., & Measer, G. (2014). A Proposed Ban on the Sale to and Possession of Caloric Sweetened Beverages by Minors in Public. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 42(Issue 1). doi:10.1111/jlme.12124

Presentations

  • Barraza, L. F., Hodge, J., Derksen, D. J., & Humble, W. (2025).

    Impacts and Opportunities for Arizona: Understanding HR1 and RHTP

    . Center for Rural Health Webinar Series.
  • Bowman, D., Hodge, J., & Barraza, L. F. (2025).

    Exploring Critical Public Health Law Trends:
    International, National, and Arizona

    . Arizona Health Law Conference & Annual Meeting.
  • Hodge, J., & Barraza, L. F. (2025).

    Policy Impacts Post-Election and Key Supreme Court Cases

    . 2025 Rural and Public Health Policy Forum.
  • Barraza, L. F., & Hall-Lipsy, E. A. (2020, November). Overcoming Legal Barriers to Healthcare for LGBTQ+ Patients. UAHS Diversity and Inclusion Speakers Series. Virtual: University of Arizona Health Sciences Center for Diversity and Inclusion.
  • Hodge, J., & Barraza, L. F. (2020, December). Election 2020: Public Health Law Reforms. National Bar Association Young Lawyers Division.
  • Hodge, J., Barraza, L. F., Piatt, J., & Wetter, S. (2020, November). COVID-19 Legislative Proposals- Assessing their Legality. Special Training Workshop for the American Public Health Association.
  • Stuebe, A., McGowan, A., Lebedevitch, C., & Barraza, L. F. (2020, May). The Role of Law and Policy in Assisting Families to Reach Healthy People’s Maternal, Infant, and Child Health Breastfeeding Goals in the United States.. United States Breastfeeding Committee’s “Power Tools” Webinar Series.
  • Barraza, L. F., & Hall-Lipsy, E. A. (2019, June). Travel in the time of communicable diseases: airport public health preparedness and legal duties. ASLME Health Law Professors Conference. Chicago, IL: ASMLE.
  • Barraza, L. F. (2018, November). Vaccine Mandates and Exemptions. UA COPH Epi Seminar.
  • Barraza, L. F. (2018, September). Public Health and Healthcare Services: Law, Policy, and Equity Division. Arizona Well-Being Commons 2018 Meeting.
    More info
    Panelist
  • Barraza, L. F., Reiss, D., & Freeman, P. (2018, October). Preventing Communicable Disease Through Vaccination Laws.. 2018 Public Health Law Conference.
  • Garba, I., Ahmed, P., Hall-Lipsy, E. A., Barraza, L. F., & Robertson, C. T. (2018, May). Smartphone Applications as Adjuncts to Medical Devices: A Case Study in Health Regulation. Sixth Annual Conference on Governance of Emerging Technologies: Law, Policy and Ethics. Tempe, AZ.
  • Barraza, L. F., Schmit, C., & Hoss, A. (2016, September). Vaccine Policy: Legal Issues, Policy Trends and Litigation. 2016 Public Health Law Conference. Washington, D.C..

Others

  • Garn, A., Derksen, D. J., Barraza, L. F., & Koch, B. D. (2023, May). Graduate Medical Education (GME) in Arizona Policy Brief.. Arizona Center for Rural Health..
  • Schell, B., & Barraza, L. F. (2022, August). Exemptions to School Entry Vaccines and Corresponding Vaccine Coverage. Network for Public Health Law: Fact Sheet.
  • Lawton, B., Hunter, D., & Barraza, L. F. (2020, September). Equitable Law and Policy Solutions to Mitigate Health Risks from Climate Change and COVID-19. Network for Public Health Law Blog.
  • Pogreba Brown, K. M., & Barraza, L. F. (2020, March). COVID-19: Your Questions About Quarantine and Isolation Answered.. BottomLineInc..
  • Rees, C., Carey, E., & Barraza, L. F. (2020, October). Safe Voting During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Public Health Orders and Legal Challenges in Two Jurisdictions. Network for Public Health Law Blog.
  • Wetter, S., & Barraza, L. F. (2020, March 2020). Fighting COVID 19 – Navigating Protections for Businesses and Workers in the United States.. Verfassungslblog.
  • Barraza, L. F., & Redmon, E. (2017, March). FDA’s Recent Drug Labeling Changes Will Help Pregnant Women and Their Physicians. Network for Public Health Law Blog.
  • Barraza, L., Hall-Lipsy, E. A., & Garba, I. (2017, July). Response: Rethinking the Belmont Report? Friesen et al. Bioethics.net Weblog. http://www.bioethics.net/2017/07/rethinking-the-belmont-report/
  • Garba, I., Hall-Lipsy, E. A., & Barraza, L. F. (2017, July 6, 2017). Rethinking the Belmont Report?. American Journal of Bioethics Blog: Bioethics.net.
    More info
    http://www.bioethics.net/2017/07/rethinking-the-belmont-report/
  • Hodge, J. G., Weidenaar, K., & Barraza, L. F. (2016, December). Integration of Health and Impact Assessments Via Environmental Policy Acts. Pew Charitable Trusts. https://www.networkforphl.org/_asset/ltcwv8/PEW-HIA-NEPA-Stage-1---Report-FINAL.pdf

Profiles With Related Publications

  • Kristen M Pogreba Brown
  • Kacey C Ernst
  • Felina Cordova
  • Elizabeth T Jacobs
  • Elizabeth A Hall-Lipsy
  • Daniel J Derksen
  • Bryna Diane Koch
  • Doug E Campos-Outcalt
  • Ibrahim Garba
  • Marion K Slack
  • Jeannie K Lee
  • Pamela Carol Garcia-Filion
  • Velia Leybas Nuno

 Edit my profile

UA Profiles | Home

University Information Security and Privacy

© 2026 The Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of The University of Arizona.